answer the two questions from the case attached , the questions is:
Q1-Where the actions that John Thain tool on personal parks and bonuses legal? Where they ethical? What does this case teach you about the difference between staying within the bounds of the law and behaving ethically?
Q2-What might John Thain have done differently? If he had pursed a different set of actions with regards to personal perks and bonuses, what might the outcome have been for him and for Merrill Lynch?
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OUR PROMOTIONAL DISCOUNT DISPLAYED ON THE WEBSITE AND GET A DISCOUNT FOR YOUR PAPER NOW!
